We can't say anything concrete about how Marion Scrymgour voted on making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory
How Marion Scrymgour voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make the cashless debit card program (a program where welfare payments are put onto controlled debit cards, also known as Indue cards, for restricted use) voluntary so that people are not forced to participate in it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory” which Marion Scrymgour could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marion Scrymgour on this policy.
| Division | Marion Scrymgour | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory” which Marion Scrymgour could have attended.
| Division | Marion Scrymgour | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Mar 2023, 5:20 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Against compulsory income management |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Marion Scrymgour was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.