We can't say anything concrete about how Ted O'Brien voted on increasing protection of Australia's fresh water
How Ted O'Brien voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the protection of Australia's fresh water resources, including its river and groundwater systems
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Ted O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ted O'Brien on this policy.
| Division | Ted O'Brien | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Ted O'Brien could have attended.
| Division | Ted O'Brien | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2023, 11:45 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate amendments |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2023, 12:18 PM – Representatives Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with bill as amended |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2023, 10:12 AM – Representatives Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ted O'Brien was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.