How Ted O'Brien voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament should immediately introduce and debate legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission, or national integrity commission, that would detect, investigate and prevent corruption at a federal level (NB: this policy is related to our other policy, called "For creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission")

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which Ted O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ted O'Brien on this policy.

Division Ted O'Brien Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which Ted O'Brien could have attended.

Division Ted O'Brien Supporters vote

25th Nov 2021, 11:37 AM – Representatives Business - Rearrangement - Let a vote on the integrity commission take place

absent Yes

20th Oct 2021, 5:36 PM – Representatives Motions - Commonwealth Integrity Commission - Don't let a vote happen

absent No

11th Jun 2020, 9:46 AM – Representatives Business - Consideration of Legislation - Don't let a vote happen

absent No

10th Sep 2019, 6:16 PM – Representatives National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) - First Reading - Consider second reading tomorrow

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ted O'Brien was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.