We can't say anything concrete about how Linda White voted on increasing protection of Australia's fresh water
How Linda White voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the protection of Australia's fresh water resources, including its river and groundwater systems
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Linda White could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Linda White on this policy.
| Division | Linda White | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Dec 2023, 8:34 PM – Senate Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 and another - in Committee - Expanding the water trigger |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Linda White could have attended.
| Division | Linda White | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2023, 10:15 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2023, 9:39 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Keep bill items as they are; held environmental water |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Linda White was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.